UK time is: 10:37:18
Vital Login
Social Login

Choose your club

Other Sites

Network Navigation

Vital Partners

'If It's Football, It's Vital'

The Howard Mess

Tim Howard did not play against us because Everton adhered to a gentleman's agreement but David Gill almost made a blunder.

The case of the Tim Howard deal just does not peter out. The League is accused of double standards as United and Everton escaped any kind of punishment while the clubs insist that the lack of a written agreement means there was no breach of rules.

As you may know, Tim Howard's loan deal was made permanent by Everton in February. The loan deal, of course, prevented him from playing against us but such clauses are irregular in the case of permanent deals. The papers revealed that despite this rule, David Gill had kept on insisting that such a clause should be included in the agreement but Richard Scudamore, chief executive of the Premier League talked him out of it.

The club, in response to all the articles, issued a statement today, admitting they, in agreement with Everton, had wanted such a clause in the deal. Their stance is that since the loan deal would have prevented Howard from playing in April 28, nothing would have changed if he had not been allowed to play after making his move to permanent. The statement stressed that both clubs had agreed on that such a clause would not endanger the integrity of the competition but the Premier League refused to allow it inserted into the contract.

Thus denied, the clubs had a gentleman's agreement and both argued that no material repercussions could have taken place had Moyes decided to field Howard, against the agreement. That argument was accepted by the league but those who smell injustice say it's just the kind of third party influence than in the case of Tevez and Mascherano which saw West Ham fined for 5.5 million pounds.

Now really, it's clear that Everton had no obligation to do our wish. They would have risked only the good relations between the clubs if they had fielded Howard so I don't see it being a crime. As for Turner making a decisive mistake - I hope that at least United fans remember that Howard was capable of committing such blunders, too! Mourinho surely did not forget the American's most spectacular one.

And for those who would like to read the full statement, it's here:

As a result of media articles this morning, the Club feels that its position in the transfer of Tim Howard has been misrepresented.

At no point did either Club set out to break FAPL rules. The transfer of Tim Howard, who was then on a season-long loan to Everton, reflected Everton's desire to acquire the player, the player's wish to secure his long-term future and Manchester United's willingness to sell him. In drafting the transfer agreement with Everton's approval, the Club inserted a clause acknowledging that Tim Howard would not be available for selection against United.

It remains both Clubs' position that such a deal could not be a 'material influence' on the integrity of the 2006/07 FAPL season if it reflects no change to the situation as it existed at the time. Before the deal, Tim Howard was not able to play against Manchester United. After the deal, the same would have been true. It therefore would have had no effect on the integrity of the competition whatsoever.

The FAPL rejected the inclusion of this in the contract.




Use your social login to comment on front page articles. Login using you Facebook, Twitter, Google or LinkedIn accounts and have your say!



Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

The Journalist

Writer: Zae Mail feedback, articles or suggestions

Date:Friday May 11 2007

Time: 2:13PM

Your Comments

i thought this got put to rest on sunday and now its back
rooneyisgod
One would expect a BIG club like yours with that massive Issssstorreeee and all to be on top of things...guess not then...resorting to cheating are we?
Blue is the colour
How many European cups have you got Bitc?
SweetLeftFoot
with us rightfully reclaiming our title i might of known chelsea fans would try to find an excuse to cover up there pain.
rooneyisgod
 

Have Your Say

Log in...
with your social network     OR     with your Vital account

Recent Manchester United Articles

Nani Staying in Lisbon! (Tuesday October 21 2014)

United`s Title Hopes? (Tuesday October 21 2014)

West Brom 2 United 2 (Tuesday October 21 2014)

Stats: West Brom v United (Tuesday October 21 2014)

West Brom v United - Team Sheets (Monday October 20 2014)

United Hoping to Pip Their Rivals! (Monday October 20 2014)

United Lining Up Torino Defender (Monday October 20 2014)

An Alves Deal is NOT Done! (Monday October 20 2014)

West Brom (a) - Stat Attack (Monday October 20 2014)

Archived Manchester United Articles

List All Vital United Articles
Have your say
Click here to suggest an article
Click here to suggest a poll

Vital Members League (view all)

League Results (view all)

Latest Results
WBA 2 - 2 Man Utd
Man Utd 2 - 1 Everton
Man Utd 2 - 1 West Ham
Leicester City 5 - 3 Man Utd
Man Utd 4 - 0 Q.P.R.
Burnley 0 - 0 Man Utd

League Table (view table)

Team P W D L GD Pts
3. Southampton 8 5 1 2 14 16
4. West Ham 8 4 1 3 4 13
5. Liverpool 8 4 1 3 1 13
6. Man Utd 8 3 3 2 3 12
7. Arsenal 8 2 5 1 2 11
8. Swansea 8 3 2 3 1 11
9. Spurs 8 3 2 3 -1 11

Breaking League News

Most Arrogant Player?
Chelsea : 22/10/2014 10:31:00
Stranger than Fiction
Chelsea : 22/10/2014 10:30:00
Are We There Yet?
Spurs : 22/10/2014 10:29:00
Remy Injury Blow
Chelsea : 22/10/2014 10:07:00
Chelsea 6 NK Maribor 0
Chelsea : 22/10/2014 10:06:00

Current Site Poll (view all polls)

MOTM v West Brom?
Suggested By:  Red Boy
De Gea 0%
Rafael 0%
Jones 0%
Rojo 0%
Shaw 0%
Blind 20%
Januzaj 0%
Mata 0%
Herrera 0%
Di Maria 40%
Van Persie 0%
Fellaini 40%
Falcao 0%
Young 0%