Vital Football

Latest Manchester United News

United - Dip Out on Cash!

United - Dip Out on Cash!

Nice little earner for somebody!

With Ben Foster paraded at a press conference this afternoon, as the new Birmingham City goalkeeper, it turns out that United will not be pocketing all the reputed £6 million fee.

Back in 2005, when Foster came to United from Stoke, the Staffordshire club were sensible enough to negotiate a selling-on clause in the deal. A clause that stipulated they`d receive 30% of any sell-on fee.

In the financially prudent words of their chairman, Peter Coates,

"We always try to cover ourselves in these deals. When we heard talk about Ben possibly going we were hoping United would get as much as possible."

Suddenly, £4.5 million for what Sir Alex called the best English keeper in the Premier League doesn`t seem that much of a good deal does it!

Vital Man United on: facebook

Vital Man United on: twitter

Join Vital Man United

It's easy to REGISTER HERE, simply click the link and enjoy getting involved!

Win FREE pizza with Vital Football!
Select your team and get 50% off if they score twice.
www.papajohns.co.uk/football



Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

Writer:Red Boy
Date:Friday May 21 2010
Time: 4:26PM

Comments

0
Considering how much Gordon cost!
elvido
21/05/2010 16:30:00
0
lol these sell on clauses are really a shrew piece of business, aren't they! Stoke can pocket a neat 1.8 million. Not that 2 million is a big amount for the big clubs, though.
JT_daniel
21/05/2010 16:48:00
0
Getting any transfer fee for a third choice goalkeeper is good business. £4m would be around 4 times more than the initial fee we paid.
tuscan3000
21/05/2010 17:04:00
0
Third?? I thought he was your second choice gk. He was touted as future gk for England when he was third choice??!!
JT_daniel
21/05/2010 18:43:00
0
For all the rubbish performances on the pitch,that is still a pretty good deal.Next year I hope we have a new keeper at Old Trafford.
Antriksh (abmtd)
21/05/2010 20:00:00
0
At the start of last season, we all thought foster would be our number 2. Instead, when given his chance Foster was a liability and was subsequently dropped for Kuszczak who did a surprisingly good job! Further to that, when VDS was fit, Kuszczak was usually the preferred option on the bench (especially for the big games).
tuscan3000
21/05/2010 21:43:00
0
I think Birmingham were being a bit generous with 6 mil so to complain about a 1.5 mil loss really doesnt bother me.
TheFamousNo7
21/05/2010 21:55:00
0
We probably only demanded that much because of the sell on clause. Also, being english makes him worth more. Not many teams will have a homegrown goalkeeper, meaning they'll have one less space in the squad for foreign players (which is the only reason I'd have kept foster over kuszczak).
tuscan3000
21/05/2010 23:22:00
0
wonder if they enquired about buying Hart on a permanent basis?
Red Boy
23/05/2010 17:44:00
0
Hart seemed better than Foster and would have cost more i imagine.
elvido
24/05/2010 06:58:00
Page 1/1
  1. 1

Login to post a comment

Recent Manchester United Articles

Sorry Louis, We`re Not Buying It!

Sometime today, or quite possibly tomorrow, we`re expecting Marouane Fellaini to be charged by the Football Association.

Leicester City (h) - Post-Match Stats

As we predicted yesterday, Manchester United proved to be the party-poopers.

AUDIO: Rooney disappointed with draw

A point earned against Leicester City seemed to be a little disappointing with Manchester United hunting down a top-four place.

Stats: Manchester United v Leicester City

All the stats from Manchester United (1) vs (1) Leicester City, Old Trafford, 01/05/16 14:05 Att: 75,275

Archived Vital United Articles

Vital United articles from

Site Journalists

Red Boy
Editor email
Profile
Charlie Bacchus
no email
Profile

Current Poll (see more polls)

MOTM v Leicester City (h)?
Suggested By: Red Boy
De Gea16%
Valencia0%
Smalling5%
Blind5%
Rojo0%
Carrick0%
Lingard0%
Fellaini5%
Rooney17%
Martial47%
Rashford0%
Mata0%
Herrera0%
Depay5%
ScoopDragon Premier League Network Sites

League Table

# Team P W D L Pts. GD
C Leicester City 36 22 11 3 77 30
2 Spurs 36 19 13 4 70 39
3 Arsenal 36 19 10 7 67 25
4 Man City 36 19 7 10 64 30
5 Man Utd 35 17 9 9 60 12
6 West Ham 35 15 14 6 59 17
7 Southampton 36 16 9 11 57 14
8 Liverpool 35 15 10 10 55 11
9 Chelsea 35 12 12 11 48 7
10 Stoke 36 13 9 14 48 -14
11 Everton 35 10 14 11 44 6
12 Watford 35 12 8 15 44 -6
13 Swansea 36 11 10 15 43 -13
14 WBA 36 10 11 15 41 -14
15 AFC Bournemouth 36 11 8 17 41 -20
16 Crystal Palace 36 10 9 17 39 -10
17 Newcastle 36 8 9 19 33 -25
18 Sunderland 35 7 11 17 32 -18
19 Norwich 35 8 7 20 31 -26
R Aston Villa 36 3 7 26 16 -45
Latest F1 News
Latest Vital Boxing News

Recent Manchester United Results (view all)

Manchester United Fixtures (view all)

May 7 2016 12:45PM : Norwich City (a)
Barclays Premier League
May 10 2016 7:45PM : West Ham United (a)
Barclays Premier League
May 15 2016 3:00PM : AFC Bournemouth (H)
Barclays Premier League