UK time is: 10:01:58
Vital Login
Social Login

Choose your club

Other Sites

Network Navigation

Vital Partners

'If It's Football, It's Vital'

United - Dip Out on Cash!

Nice little earner for somebody!

With Ben Foster paraded at a press conference this afternoon, as the new Birmingham City goalkeeper, it turns out that United will not be pocketing all the reputed 6 million fee.

Back in 2005, when Foster came to United from Stoke, the Staffordshire club were sensible enough to negotiate a selling-on clause in the deal. A clause that stipulated they`d receive 30% of any sell-on fee.

In the financially prudent words of their chairman, Peter Coates,

"We always try to cover ourselves in these deals. When we heard talk about Ben possibly going we were hoping United would get as much as possible."

Suddenly, 4.5 million for what Sir Alex called the best English keeper in the Premier League doesn`t seem that much of a good deal does it!

Vital Man United on: facebook

Vital Man United on: twitter

Join Vital Man United

It's easy to REGISTER HERE, simply click the link and enjoy getting involved!




Use your social login to comment on front page articles. Login using you Facebook, Twitter, Google or LinkedIn accounts and have your say!



Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

The Journalist

Writer: Red Boy Mail feedback, articles or suggestions

Date:Friday May 21 2010

Time: 4:26PM

Your Comments (oldest first)

Change to most recent first
Considering how much Gordon cost!
elvido
Report Abuse
21/05/2010 16:30:00

lol these sell on clauses are really a shrew piece of business, aren't they! Stoke can pocket a neat 1.8 million. Not that 2 million is a big amount for the big clubs, though.
JT_daniel
Report Abuse
21/05/2010 16:48:00

Getting any transfer fee for a third choice goalkeeper is good business. 4m would be around 4 times more than the initial fee we paid.
tuscan3000
Report Abuse
21/05/2010 17:04:00

Third?? I thought he was your second choice gk. He was touted as future gk for England when he was third choice??!!
JT_daniel
Report Abuse
21/05/2010 18:43:00

For all the rubbish performances on the pitch,that is still a pretty good deal.Next year I hope we have a new keeper at Old Trafford.
Antriksh (abmtd)
Report Abuse
21/05/2010 20:00:00

At the start of last season, we all thought foster would be our number 2. Instead, when given his chance Foster was a liability and was subsequently dropped for Kuszczak who did a surprisingly good job! Further to that, when VDS was fit, Kuszczak was usually the preferred option on the bench (especially for the big games).
tuscan3000
Report Abuse
21/05/2010 21:43:00

I think Birmingham were being a bit generous with 6 mil so to complain about a 1.5 mil loss really doesnt bother me.
TheFamousNo7
Report Abuse
21/05/2010 21:55:00

We probably only demanded that much because of the sell on clause. Also, being english makes him worth more. Not many teams will have a homegrown goalkeeper, meaning they'll have one less space in the squad for foreign players (which is the only reason I'd have kept foster over kuszczak).
tuscan3000
Report Abuse
21/05/2010 23:22:00

wonder if they enquired about buying Hart on a permanent basis?
Red Boy
Report Abuse
23/05/2010 17:44:00

Hart seemed better than Foster and would have cost more i imagine.
elvido
Report Abuse
24/05/2010 06:58:00

 

Have Your Say

Log in...
with your social network     OR     with your Vital account

Recent Manchester United Articles

United in Hunt for Reus Rumour (Saturday January 31 2015)

Bale Treasure Chest Put Aside (Saturday January 31 2015)

United v Leicester - Stat Attack (Friday January 30 2015)

Anderson Set to Finally Leave (Friday January 30 2015)

Carrick injury Woe (Friday January 30 2015)

No Purchases Only Sales (Friday January 30 2015)

Is Strootman Deal Now Off the Agenda? (Friday January 30 2015)

Fletcher Looks to be West Ham Bound (Friday January 30 2015)

Phelan Set for Hull Role (Friday January 30 2015)

Clyne Talk is 100% Speculation (Friday January 30 2015)

Archived Manchester United Articles

List All Vital United Articles
Have your say
Click here to suggest an article
Click here to suggest a poll

Vital Members League (view all)

League Results (view all)

Latest Results
Q.P.R. 0 - 2 Man Utd
Man Utd 0 - 1 Southampton
Stoke 1 - 1 Man Utd
Spurs 0 - 0 Man Utd
Man Utd 3 - 1 Newcastle
Aston Villa 1 - 1 Man Utd

League Table (view table)

Team P W D L GD Pts
1. Chelsea 22 16 4 2 32 52
2. Man City 22 14 5 3 23 47
3. Southampton 22 13 3 6 21 42
4. Man Utd 22 11 7 4 15 40
5. Arsenal 22 11 6 5 14 39
6. Spurs 22 11 4 7 2 37
7. West Ham 22 10 6 6 10 36

Breaking League News

United in Hunt for Reus Rumour
Man Utd : 31/01/2015 09:58:00
Bale Treasure Chest Put Aside
Man Utd : 31/01/2015 09:52:00
Hammers to Sell Noble?
West Ham : 31/01/2015 09:43:00
Liverpool v West Ham - Stat Attack
West Ham : 31/01/2015 09:34:00
Match Day Moments - City (h)
Chelsea : 31/01/2015 09:20:00

Current Site Poll (view all polls)

United v Leicester?
Suggested By:  Red Boy
United to win! 90%
Leicester to win! 5%
Draw! 5%