Vital Football

Latest Manchester United News

United - Dip Out on Cash!

United - Dip Out on Cash!

Nice little earner for somebody!

With Ben Foster paraded at a press conference this afternoon, as the new Birmingham City goalkeeper, it turns out that United will not be pocketing all the reputed £6 million fee.

Back in 2005, when Foster came to United from Stoke, the Staffordshire club were sensible enough to negotiate a selling-on clause in the deal. A clause that stipulated they`d receive 30% of any sell-on fee.

In the financially prudent words of their chairman, Peter Coates,

"We always try to cover ourselves in these deals. When we heard talk about Ben possibly going we were hoping United would get as much as possible."

Suddenly, £4.5 million for what Sir Alex called the best English keeper in the Premier League doesn`t seem that much of a good deal does it!

Vital Man United on: facebook

Vital Man United on: twitter

Join Vital Man United

It's easy to REGISTER HERE, simply click the link and enjoy getting involved!

Exclusive to Vital ! Read now ! The Vital Boxing John H Stacey Interview



Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

Writer:Red Boy
Date:Friday May 21 2010
Time: 4:26PM

Comments

0
Considering how much Gordon cost!
elvido
21/05/2010 16:30:00
0
lol these sell on clauses are really a shrew piece of business, aren't they! Stoke can pocket a neat 1.8 million. Not that 2 million is a big amount for the big clubs, though.
JT_daniel
21/05/2010 16:48:00
0
Getting any transfer fee for a third choice goalkeeper is good business. £4m would be around 4 times more than the initial fee we paid.
tuscan3000
21/05/2010 17:04:00
0
Third?? I thought he was your second choice gk. He was touted as future gk for England when he was third choice??!!
JT_daniel
21/05/2010 18:43:00
0
For all the rubbish performances on the pitch,that is still a pretty good deal.Next year I hope we have a new keeper at Old Trafford.
Antriksh (abmtd)
21/05/2010 20:00:00
0
At the start of last season, we all thought foster would be our number 2. Instead, when given his chance Foster was a liability and was subsequently dropped for Kuszczak who did a surprisingly good job! Further to that, when VDS was fit, Kuszczak was usually the preferred option on the bench (especially for the big games).
tuscan3000
21/05/2010 21:43:00
0
I think Birmingham were being a bit generous with 6 mil so to complain about a 1.5 mil loss really doesnt bother me.
TheFamousNo7
21/05/2010 21:55:00
0
We probably only demanded that much because of the sell on clause. Also, being english makes him worth more. Not many teams will have a homegrown goalkeeper, meaning they'll have one less space in the squad for foreign players (which is the only reason I'd have kept foster over kuszczak).
tuscan3000
21/05/2010 23:22:00
0
wonder if they enquired about buying Hart on a permanent basis?
Red Boy
23/05/2010 17:44:00
0
Hart seemed better than Foster and would have cost more i imagine.
elvido
24/05/2010 06:58:00
Page 1/1
  1. 1

Login to post a comment

Recent Manchester United Articles

Spurs (h) - An Array of Fascinating Facts

This Sunday the Premier League is our focus with Tottenham Hotspur visiting Old Trafford.

Spurs (h) - Managerial Speak

With the Europa League put to bed, until the New Year, Manchester United will be hoping to get their Premier League aspirations back on track in the coming weeks.

Quartet Interested in United`s Young

As speculation mounts that a move, away from Old Trafford, may be on the cards.

United v Spurs - Early Team-News

After safely getting through to the knockout stages of the Europa League the focus switches back to the Premier League this weekend.

Archived Vital United Articles

Vital United articles from

Site Journalists

Red Boy
Editor email
Profile
Charlie Bacchus
no email
Profile

Current Poll (see more polls)

MOTM v FC Zorya Luhansk?
Suggested By: Red Boy
Romero0%
Young0%
Bailly4%
Rojo0%
Blind0%
Herrera4%
Mata12%
Pogba4%
Rooney0%
Mkhitaryan68%
Ibrahimovic4%
Lingard0%
Fellaini4%
Fosu-Mensah0%
ScoopDragon Premier League Network Sites

League Table

# Team P W D L Pts. GD
1 Arsenal 15 10 4 1 34 21
2 Chelsea 14 11 1 2 34 21
3 Liverpool 14 9 3 2 30 17
4 Man City 15 9 3 3 30 13
5 Spurs 14 7 6 1 27 14
6 Man Utd 14 5 6 3 21 3
7 Watford 15 6 3 6 21 -5
8 WBA 14 5 5 4 20 3
9 Everton 15 5 5 5 20 0
10 Stoke 15 5 4 6 19 -5
11 AFC Bournemouth 15 5 3 7 18 -4
12 Southampton 14 4 5 5 17 -2
13 Burnley 15 5 2 8 17 -10
14 Leicester City 15 4 4 7 16 -5
15 Crystal Palace 15 4 3 8 15 -2
16 Middlesbrough 14 3 6 5 15 -2
17 Swansea 15 3 3 9 12 -12
18 West Ham 14 3 3 8 12 -14
19 Hull City 15 3 3 9 12 -18
20 Sunderland 15 3 2 10 11 -13
The Vital Football Members League
Latest F1 News
Latest Vital Boxing News
Vital Football Comment

Recent Manchester United Results (view all)

Manchester United Fixtures (view all)

Dec 11 2016 2:15PM : Tottenham Hotspur (H)
Barclays Premier League
Dec 14 2016 8:00PM : Crystal Palace (a)
Barclays Premier League
Dec 17 2016 5:30PM : West Bromwich Albion (a)
Barclays Premier League
Dec 26 2016 3:00PM : Sunderland (H)
Barclays Premier League
Dec 31 2016 3:00PM : Middlesbrough (H)
Barclays Premier League
Jan 2 2017 5:15PM : West Ham United (a)
Barclays Premier League

Vital Members League Table

RankNamePoints
1.Croc1
Write for Vital Football