UK time is: 13:56:45
Vital Login
Social Login

Choose your club

Other Sites

Network Navigation

Vital Partners

'If It's Football, It's Vital'

United - Dip Out on Cash!

Nice little earner for somebody!

With Ben Foster paraded at a press conference this afternoon, as the new Birmingham City goalkeeper, it turns out that United will not be pocketing all the reputed 6 million fee.

Back in 2005, when Foster came to United from Stoke, the Staffordshire club were sensible enough to negotiate a selling-on clause in the deal. A clause that stipulated they`d receive 30% of any sell-on fee.

In the financially prudent words of their chairman, Peter Coates,

"We always try to cover ourselves in these deals. When we heard talk about Ben possibly going we were hoping United would get as much as possible."

Suddenly, 4.5 million for what Sir Alex called the best English keeper in the Premier League doesn`t seem that much of a good deal does it!

Vital Man United on: facebook

Vital Man United on: twitter

Join Vital Man United

It's easy to REGISTER HERE, simply click the link and enjoy getting involved!




Use your social login to comment on front page articles. Login using you Facebook, Twitter, Google or LinkedIn accounts and have your say!



Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

The Journalist

Writer: Red Boy Mail feedback, articles or suggestions

Date:Friday May 21 2010

Time: 4:26PM

Your Comments (oldest first)

Change to most recent first
Considering how much Gordon cost!
elvido
Report Abuse
21/05/2010 16:30:00

lol these sell on clauses are really a shrew piece of business, aren't they! Stoke can pocket a neat 1.8 million. Not that 2 million is a big amount for the big clubs, though.
JT_daniel
Report Abuse
21/05/2010 16:48:00

Getting any transfer fee for a third choice goalkeeper is good business. 4m would be around 4 times more than the initial fee we paid.
tuscan3000
Report Abuse
21/05/2010 17:04:00

Third?? I thought he was your second choice gk. He was touted as future gk for England when he was third choice??!!
JT_daniel
Report Abuse
21/05/2010 18:43:00

For all the rubbish performances on the pitch,that is still a pretty good deal.Next year I hope we have a new keeper at Old Trafford.
Antriksh (abmtd)
Report Abuse
21/05/2010 20:00:00

At the start of last season, we all thought foster would be our number 2. Instead, when given his chance Foster was a liability and was subsequently dropped for Kuszczak who did a surprisingly good job! Further to that, when VDS was fit, Kuszczak was usually the preferred option on the bench (especially for the big games).
tuscan3000
Report Abuse
21/05/2010 21:43:00

I think Birmingham were being a bit generous with 6 mil so to complain about a 1.5 mil loss really doesnt bother me.
TheFamousNo7
Report Abuse
21/05/2010 21:55:00

We probably only demanded that much because of the sell on clause. Also, being english makes him worth more. Not many teams will have a homegrown goalkeeper, meaning they'll have one less space in the squad for foreign players (which is the only reason I'd have kept foster over kuszczak).
tuscan3000
Report Abuse
21/05/2010 23:22:00

wonder if they enquired about buying Hart on a permanent basis?
Red Boy
Report Abuse
23/05/2010 17:44:00

Hart seemed better than Foster and would have cost more i imagine.
elvido
Report Abuse
24/05/2010 06:58:00

 

Have Your Say

Log in...
with your social network     OR     with your Vital account

Recent Manchester United Articles

Hernandez Growing Frustrated (Monday March 30 2015)

I Should Jolly Well Hope So! (Monday March 30 2015)

Is Now Hummels Time? (Monday March 30 2015)

Ibrahimovic for United? (Sunday March 29 2015)

Nani`s Coming Back (Sunday March 29 2015)

Van Gaal Chasing a 1million Bonus! (Sunday March 29 2015)

Is Juventus the Destination? (Sunday March 29 2015)

United Set to Reject Arsenal Bid (Friday March 27 2015)

Archived Manchester United Articles

List All Vital United Articles
Have your say
Click here to suggest an article
Click here to suggest a poll
ScoopDragon Premier League Network Sites

Vital Members League (view all)

League Table (view table)

Team P W D L GD Pts
1. Chelsea 29 20 7 2 36 67
2. Man City 30 18 7 5 34 61
3. Arsenal 30 18 6 6 27 60
4. Man Utd 30 17 8 5 25 59
5. Liverpool 30 16 6 8 12 54
6. Southampton 30 16 5 9 21 53
7. Spurs 30 16 5 9 5 53

Breaking League News

Hernandez Growing Frustrated
Man Utd : 30/03/2015 13:39:01
I Should Jolly Well Hope So!
Man Utd : 30/03/2015 13:31:00
Is Now Hummels Time?
Man Utd : 30/03/2015 13:26:00
Is Oscar`s Chelsea Career Coming to an End?
Chelsea : 30/03/2015 13:19:00
Transfer Strategy
Spurs : 30/03/2015 13:00:00

Current Site Poll (view all polls)

MOTM v Liverpool?
Suggested By:  Red Boy
De Gea 2%
Valencia 1%
Jones 0%
Smalling 1%
Blind 1%
Carrick 1%
Herrera 10%
Mata 65%
Fellaini 12%
Rooney 0%
Young 0%
Di Maria 3%
Falcao 1%
Rojo 3%