Vital Football

Latest Manchester United News

Time To Deploy Rooney Wide Again

Time To Deploy Rooney Wide Again

United have next to no chance at Stamford Bridge today, it has to be said. Chelsea are in form while we are not, the game will be played at a stadium we have a terrible record in and we won't have our first-choice back four available.

But if we want a little hope of getting something out of this game, I believe 4-4-2 must be forgotten and we'll have to try and shatter Chelsea's diamond. That means a three-man midfield with Carrick, Anderson and Fletcher, with the latter two doing the running and closing down which proved our downfall at Anfield.

This of course brings a problem as well: who should be left out of the front four of Giggs, Berbatov, Rooney and Valencia? I don't expect Fergie to get to the same conclusion but I would leave Giggs out, quite simply because he does not have the legs, the stamina to start at Stamford Bridge. There's another reason, too: playing Giggs would mean Fergie would play Rooney as an out-and-out centre-forward which does not really suit him, as we saw against Arsenal. That should be Berbatov's job today.

Which brings us back to Giggs v Rooney: it should be Rooney. Fergie is reluctant to leave him out anyway (with good reason, of course, as he's our best player) and he would be able to threaten from wide positions, as he demonstrated so often last season. It's not his favourite nor his most effective role on the pitch but we can't expect to dominate the midfield against Chelsea and he could be easily marked out of the game as a second striker if the midfield do not provide enough support.

And that's why, in my opinion, 4-4-2 is not the way to go today. 4-4-2 would mean that in order to cover the defence we should surrender a positive attitude to the game: either Fletcher or Carrick would have to stay behind at all times, ready to choke the space in which Lampard operates while the other would be left to struggle against Essien, Ballack and presumably Deco. Rooney and Berbatov would be starved of service, just as they were at Anfield. A three-man midfield might represent a more negative formation than 4-4-2 but it would allow a more positive mindset and that, in my opinion, is more important.



Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

Writer:Zae
Date:Sunday November 8 2009
Time: 11:16AM

Comments

0
I can't really disagree with that.
One United 92
08/11/2009 13:15:00
Page 1/1
  1. 1

Login to post a comment

Recent Manchester United Articles

Where Next for James Wilson?

Last season, eyebrows were raised when Louis van Gaal decided to loan our young striker James Wilson to Brighton and Hove Albion.

Financial Jiggery-Pokery!

But all above board!

United Pogba Deal is ON!

But will it be sealed?

Youngster Turns Down New United Deal

As he contemplates his next move.

Archived Vital United Articles

Vital United articles from

Site Journalists

Red Boy
Editor email
Profile
Charlie Bacchus
no email
Profile

Current Poll (see more polls)

Who would you prefer United to sign?
Suggested By: Red Boy
Zlatan Ibrahimovic23%
Robert Lewandowski69%
Neither8%
ScoopDragon Premier League Network Sites

League Table

# Team P W D L Pts. GD
C Leicester City 38 23 12 3 81 32
2 Arsenal 38 20 11 7 71 29
3 Spurs 38 19 13 6 70 34
4 Man City 38 19 9 10 66 30
5 Man Utd 38 19 9 10 66 14
6 Southampton 38 18 9 11 63 18
7 West Ham 38 16 14 8 62 14
8 Liverpool 38 16 12 10 60 13
9 Stoke 38 14 9 15 51 -14
10 Chelsea 38 12 14 12 50 6
11 Everton 38 11 14 13 47 4
12 Swansea 38 12 11 15 47 -10
13 Watford 38 12 9 17 45 -10
14 WBA 38 10 13 15 43 -14
15 Crystal Palace 38 11 9 18 42 -12
16 AFC Bournemouth 38 11 9 18 42 -22
17 Sunderland 38 9 12 17 39 -14
R Newcastle 38 9 10 19 37 -21
R Norwich 38 9 7 22 34 -28
R Aston Villa 38 3 8 27 17 -49
Latest F1 News
Latest Vital Boxing News

Recent Manchester United Results (view all)

Manchester United Fixtures (view all)

Vital Members League Table

RankNamePoints
1.dobechukwu1
2.expertdocs1
3.Cathal P Forde1