Vital Football

Latest Manchester United News

It Was Worth Signing Owen Just For This

It Was Worth Signing Owen Just For This

The best Manchester derby I've ever seen. Granted, we were majestic in the 5-0 win at Old Trafford and there was great drama when we came back from two behind but this tops them all.

Well, mostly because United insisted on digging City out of a hole every time we managed to push them into it. We started excellently, with a sharp finish from Rooney to put us in front. And we did not stop: we played at a high tempo, we pressed them, we tested them.

But this initial exuberance vanished quickly and not long after the first quarter of an hour passed, City were level thanks to an astonishing howler from Ben Foster who does not look like capable of being consistently good. And the goal killed us: for the remained of the first half, the football was turgid and it was City who almost took the lead when Tevez raced clear and hit the post from 13 yards.

But the second half. Well, that was magnificent, magnificent on the grand scale. United started brightly and snatched the lead again with a powerful header from Fletcher. Once again, we did not stop and created two more chances before disaster struck again: nobody bothered to make an effort of closing Bellamy down and he unleashed a quite gorgeous shot into the far corner.

United, in response, camped themselves in the City half for half an hour but an inspired Given saved just about everything: Berbatov's two firm headers, Giggs' close-range chance, Giggs' volley - but he could not save Darren Fletcher's header when the absolutely magnificent Ryan Giggs whipped in a freekick in the 81st minute.

But it still wasn't over. Richards missed a great chance to equalise then Rio carelessly gave the ball away to let Bellamy to race clear on the left and slot the ball home from a very, very difficult angle. Foster should have covered it better but the biggest part of the blame goes to Rio Ferdinand here.

In the meantime, the fourth official put up the board to show there will a MINIMUM of four minutes of added time. City celebrations lasted a minute and Fergie, somewhat surprisingly, made a substitution in the 92nd minute, introducing Carrick for Anderson. But still it was a bit baffling why the referee allowed us to play well into the 96th minute - and it was 95:28 when Giggs brought down a headed ball, threaded a beautiful pass to the unmarked Owen who slotted home coolly.

Oh God. I barely remember anything from the next few minutes, vaguely recall that a few men jumped on top of me, yelling in delight and I seem to remember that I did not mind it in the slightest. It was well worth signing Michael Owen just for this priceless moment. Cocky City, barely out of their own half for the entire second half, were put to their rightful place.



*Try Vital Mobile FOR FREE for the latest news, scores, fixtures and so much more*

Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

Writer:Zae
Date:Sunday September 20 2009
Time: 8:00PM

Best of Vital Network

Vital Boxing - Can Crolla Beat Linares?

Comments

0
Given kept them in touching distance - if it hadnt been for him it would have been about 7/8 - 3
niteworlok
20/09/2009 23:15:00
0
The additional time is fully accounted for when you take into account their celebrations and the substitution. It was great to see Owen score the winner. Makes the decision to dump Tevez all the sweeter for me - all those city fans bleating about how Tevez has scored every important goal for us since the beginning of time can now shut up and begin to appreciate how frustratingly wasteful he can be in front of goal.
tuscan3000
20/09/2009 23:42:00
0
The official rules for stoppage time from the FA are: ----------- “Many stoppages in play are entirely natural (e.g. throw-ins, goal kicks). An allowance is to be made only when these delays are excessive. The fourth official indicates the minimum additional time decided by the referee at the end of the final minute of each period of play. The announcement of the additional time does not indicate the exact amount of time left in the match. The time may be increased if the referee considers it appropriate but never reduced. The referee must not compensate for a timekeeping error during the first half by increasing or reducing the length of the second half.” ------------- So was there really 5 and a half minutes of excessive celebrating and excessive time spent on substitutions? Because there were no injuries at all.
MCFC_Goatboy
21/09/2009 00:16:00
0
You'll find in your own post goatboy that the rule says a 'minimum' of additional time.
gunnerkid107
21/09/2009 03:51:00
0
"But still it was a bit baffling why the referee allowed us to play well into the 96th minute"- Obviously. Because the ref wanted to play on till you got the goal. Shocking and I wont be surprised if City take the FA to the courts over this!
JT_daniel
21/09/2009 05:08:00
0
"You'll find in your own post goatboy that the rule says a 'minimum' of additional time. gunnerkid107' That is, you muppet, if there is a reason or furthur delay. There was no delay which championed a furthur added time of 3 minutes, TO THE ADDED TIME! Fixing. Blatant match fixing.
JT_daniel
21/09/2009 05:09:00
0
So why werent City good enough to score again??
niteworlok
21/09/2009 07:12:00
0
gunner kid - no injuries at all second half and no timewasting... no 'excessive' delays on subs or goals so where did the 4 minutes come from never mind the magic 3 minutes extra. And Worlock our understrength forward line was good enough to score 3 at the swamp and if the game stops on time that is enough.
MCFC_Goatboy
21/09/2009 08:38:00
0
What further 3 mins are you talking about. 4 mins added time was shown - its irrelevant whether anyone agrees with that as it was 4 mins in which both sides had equal opportunity to score or conceed - and I think you'll find that city scored. They then took almost a full minute to celebrate their goal (56 seconds) and the rules state that the ref should add 30 seconds per sub so the added time was perfectly fair - get over it.
tuscan3000
21/09/2009 08:42:00
0
JT_daniel... really?! He was gonna play on for say, half an hour cos United still hadn't scored?? We were the better team and deserved the points - we were well on top in teh second half. City had 6 minutes of added time to hold on. If they couldn't do that, how can they expect to win the title?! Keep the ball and United wouldn't have been able to get that goal. That we kept going till the final whistle (when games end) not the final minute, (and City apparently didn't) was why we got the goal. City only equalised in the 90th minute, there was always gonna be time added on. Holding on for six minutes shouldn't have been that hard. Tusacan3000, exactly. These match-fixing claims are totally misplaced - the amount of time extra was adequate considering there was a goal and substitution. Even if City had got the point, we still deserved to win the game, and that we ultimately did. That we scored 4 against a City defence that previously had only conceded once (against Arsenal) shows that we're getting into gear. On United, we're looking good if a little reliant on Rooney (who scored his 8th goal of the season yesterday) though other players are starting to perform. We've now beaten Arsenal, Spurs and City in a row (who all previously had perfect records) and had a tricky trip to Turkey in between (which we also won).
Man utd champions
21/09/2009 16:00:00
Page 1/2
  1. 1
  2. 2

Login to post a comment

Recent Manchester United Articles

United Duo Make Spanish Squad

Juan Mata is back in favour.

Jose's Europa League Draw Reaction

It`s not the Champions League but…….

Hull v Manchester United - Ten of the Best!

A decent start to the season has seen the pre-season expectation levels kept high.

Hull (a) - Pre-Match Views from the Benches!

This afternoon Manchester United, in the late kick-off, visit Hull City.

Archived Vital United Articles

Vital United articles from

Site Journalists

Red Boy
Editor email
Profile
Charlie Bacchus
no email
Profile

Current Poll (see more polls)

Hull v Manchester Utd?
Suggested By:
Hull to Win!6%
Manchester to Win!94%
Score Draw!0%
0-0 Draw!0%
ScoopDragon Premier League Network Sites

League Table

# Team P W D L Pts. GD
1 Man City 2 2 0 0 6 4
2 Man Utd 2 2 0 0 6 4
3 Hull City 2 2 0 0 6 3
4 Chelsea 2 2 0 0 6 2
5 Everton 2 1 1 0 4 1
6 Middlesbrough 2 1 1 0 4 1
7 Spurs 2 1 1 0 4 1
8 Burnley 2 1 0 1 3 1
9 WBA 2 1 0 1 3 0
10 West Ham 2 1 0 1 3 0
11 Liverpool 2 1 0 1 3 -1
12 Swansea 2 1 0 1 3 -1
13 Arsenal 2 0 1 1 1 -1
14 Watford 2 0 1 1 1 -1
15 Leicester City 2 0 1 1 1 -1
16 Southampton 2 0 1 1 1 -2
17 Stoke 2 0 1 1 1 -3
18 Sunderland 2 0 0 2 0 -2
19 Crystal Palace 2 0 0 2 0 -2
20 AFC Bournemouth 2 0 0 2 0 -3
Latest F1 News
Latest Vital Boxing News

Recent Manchester United Results (view all)

Manchester United Fixtures (view all)

Vital Members League Table

RankNamePoints
1.TheFamousNo73
2.ForeverUnited1