Vital Football

Latest Manchester United News

United Lost The Midfield Battle

United Lost The Midfield Battle

Often the reasons of defeat are hard to find. Bad luck can play a part, individual mistakes, too and bad tactics can be disastrous as well. This time, however, there's not a great deal of investigation required: United lost the Champions League final because Barcelona easily won the midfield battle which proved crucial.

Why could they do so? Well, first I must repeat myself: Xavi and Iniesta are the best midfielders in the world right now. They have fantastic quality and on their day are unstoppable. How do you stop them? You need two energetic, quick tacklers and a third midfielder to tie up the loose ends.

Chelsea's midfield was physical enough in the second leg of the semi-final but could barely get out of their own half because it wasn't balanced enough. United's midfield yesterday was neither physical nor balanced enough. And it is easy to see why.

Carrick is a fine player - if he's allowed to dictate the game from deep, if he's got the time to read the patterns and make timely interceptions. In order to do that against such a strong team like Barcelona he would have needed another pair of legs in front of him, doing the dirty work.

Anderson tried but he rarely knew which way to turn as one of Xavi, Iniesta or Busquets was always available. Why? Because our third midfielder, Ryan Giggs, played too far ahead and he tracked back way too rarely. And Carrick, well, it would have been unreasonable to expect him to follow either Xavi or Iniesta everywhere as they are both much quicker than him.

So, my conclusion is predictable: what we desperately missed was either Hargreaves or Fletcher. I'm not saying we would have won the game with them - but we would have offered a sterner resistance, would have given a better account of ourselves.

Of course, all of this is that wonderful thing, hindsight. I was all for starting Ryan Giggs and still can't think of a better midfield in the absence of the aforementioned players. What is slightly baffling for me, though, is that why was Giggs positioned so far ahead? He was effectively a second striker behind Ronaldo for much of the game so it wasn't really 4-3-3, more like a 4-2-3-1. But for the latter formation, either Tevez or Berbatov would have been better (possibly).

And even so, it could have worked. Oh yes. Barcelona were really nervous in the opening minutes and we came out of the blocks flying. Valdes could not hold Ronaldo's free-kick and if only Park had been that little bit quicker to react... And a few minutes later, Ronaldo had a chance from inside the box but his shot just eluded the far corner.

Had we taken the lead it would have been a vastly different game and we had the chances to do so. But when Barcelona first crossed the halfway line Iniesta brutally exposed the limitations of our midfield: Carrick and Anderson were waiting for each other, neither attempted to tackle him so he had time and space to pick out a pass to Samuel Eto'o who embarassed Vidic (really, why he couldn't keep him on the outside? That would have been harmless) and scored.

Our mental collapse afterwards had a simple reason: we were set up to counter-attack and that was impossible with these lightning-quick front players pressing us all the time. Our unbalanced midfield wasn't allowed time on the ball and they aggravated the problem by being in a hurry even on the rare occasions when we had the chance to bring the ball out of defence and do some nice build-up play.

I think it was somewhat of a tactical decision: Fergie knew that in the absence of the tacklers we have we cannot pass ourselves through the midfield so he urged the troops to get the ball quickly to the front line to test Barcelona's supposedly weak defence. But these long ball were desperately inaccurate and rarely found their target.

And there's another thing, too. Barcelona sacrificed much of their attacking threat in order to ensure their defending remains disciplined and focused. Their midfield players closed down even the tiniest bit of spaces and even Eto'o and Henry tracked back on occasions. They didn't have as much possession as usually, only 52% but they defended better than any time I've ever seen them. They were constantly threatening in attack, of course but their safety-first approach was clear - and very efficient.

They deserved to win. It wasn't a 'battering', as Oliver Holt put it in the Mirror, barely concealing his delight and we weren't 'outclassed': quite simply we lost to a team which was in better form and had a better line-up on the night. Their midfield ensured they did not feel the absence of their defenders and that we had reasons to lament the suspension of Fletcher and the injury of Hargreaves. End of.

For the very latest Premier League odds

Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

Date:Thursday May 28 2009
Time: 1:04PM


Zae,my friend,I totally agree about the midfield situation but what caught my eye was the end of your article.I was thinking of the same thing but its normal,the media all around the world is the same.First they hype u up and they expect u to just win,losing is not an option and when u lose the same media will crucify u in a way that there has to be changes,may be the manager should step down,etc.It seems as if we have to pay the price for doing so well.
28/05/2009 17:00:00
it was men against boys...what you needed was a manu loving ref. who would let your team get away with kicking and bullying the skillful passing team out of the game,and give you soft freekicks in dangerous areas...but alas this is not the premiership
fran merida
28/05/2009 17:59:00
Chelsea's physicality certainly helped them in midfield against Barca, but more credit should be given to their defending. In the first leg they parked the bus. In the second they were forced to go forward more, and in all fairness they thwarted everything Barca had--save for the last miracle goal at the very end, when I think Chelsea was so exhausted they lost concentration. Your midfield let you down but so did your defense.
29/05/2009 03:34:00
Carrick and co are alright against teams lower down in the prem but our midfield was exposed for what it is in Rome. The return of Hargreaves will give us half of what we need if we are going to compete at the very top next season, especially if pool and Chelsea invest over the summer break. We need a proven midfielder who will be hard to come by; strength in depth is one thing but we need big players for big games and our midfield isn’t up to it as it stands.
29/05/2009 08:27:00
Police have confirmed that they have arrested a 27 year old Manchester man on suspicion of fraud. The man named as Michael Carrick is believed to have being at the centre of an £18m scam. The man charged has been masquerading as a top class international centre midfielder for 3 years. Italian authorities have handed overwhelming evidence of the fraud to English police including video footage of his inability to retain the ball, hit long range forward passes and poor defending.
29/05/2009 11:09:00
That's a little harsh, Gleeson! Although to be fair it looked as if Carrick had never seen a football against Barcelona. I think he cracked under the pressure.
29/05/2009 12:36:00
Manc fans need to take off those rose tinted glasses for once , you`re fans are well known 4 your bias distorted opinion of your team.....Man Utd couldnt even touch the ball 4 long periods and were chasing shadows...the whole world witnessed your team get battered...whether u Mancs accept it or not..the whole world saw it ....and the whole world laughed at you.......
I Bling Red
29/05/2009 21:59:00
Lol Gleeson! But Carrick is their best midfeilder - apart from are really really missing him! I rate him, and a lot higher than Ji Sung Park and Anderson. Fletcher has had a good season, but you'll never have the mid we have of Lamps, Ballack and Essien!
29/05/2009 23:46:00
Mr Feguson and Manchester united...Fact - premier champions 2009 (for the 3rd time running). Fact - club world champions 2009. Fact - carling cup 2009. Mr benitez and liverpool 2009. Fact - NOTHING!
30/05/2009 22:24:00
...I agree sky, but we won the FA Cup yesterday! :)
31/05/2009 13:15:00
Page 1/2
  1. 1
  2. 2

Login to post a comment

Best of International Football News

Recent Manchester United Articles

A Closer Look At The Manchester United Injury List

Our weekly update looking at the injury table for Manchester United and also comparing with all our competitors in the Premier League.

One Transfer Deadline Was Never Enough Was It

You've got to love the football authorities, if transfer deadline days weren't ridiculous enough already - they've now begun to breed.

Manchester United v Chelsea - Match Officials

After returning from Spain and a return to Champions League action, against Sevilla, Manchester United welcome Chelsea to Old Trafford this weekend.

Stats: Sevilla v Manchester United

All the stats from Sevilla (0) vs (0) Manchester United, Ramón Sánchez Pizjuán Stadium, 21/02/18 19:45 Att: 39,725

Manchester United Archived Articles

Vital United articles from

Site Journalists

Red Boy
Editor email
Charlie Bacchus
no email

Current Poll (see more polls)

MOTM v Sevilla (a)?
Suggested By: Red Boy
De Gea88%
ScoopDragon Premier League Network Sites
Write for Vital Football
Latest F1 News
Latest Vital Boxing News
The Vital Football Members League

Recent Manchester United Results (view all)

Manchester United Fixtures

Vital Members League Table

1.united news1
Vital Football Comment